HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST

Human Rights Watch is the Arm of George Soros and a propaganda tool of the CIA. So if they weigh in on the events in Palestine they are doing so for political advantage to the US and client state Israel.

HRW is wealthy and its tentacles reach out across the globe.

HRW has opposed the sovereignty of Peoples Republic of China. Roth prosecutes the campaign opposing the right of the Chinese government to rule in Tibet and Xinchiang province. Roth has used the financial resources of Human Rights Watch to develop ongoing media campaigns against the revolution in Colombia. HRW actively opposed the election of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe.

Human Rights Watch Director Ken Roth is a powerful establishment figure. He helped overthrow the government of Slobodan Milosevic.

In an opinion piece in of the Wall Street Journal (3/22) Roth has suggested a new tack on the U.S. war on Iraq, "Indict Saddam Hussein."

HRW is 100% in support of the ICTY kangaroo court in The Hague. HRW supported the right of NATO and the Security Council to transgress all international law in the creation of such a "tribunal." HRW justified the kidnapping which brought Milosevic to his prison in The Hague last summer.

Swans, an Internet website that posts articles not printed in the popular media recently noted the role of the George Soros' Human Rights watch in verifying US propaganda. Stephen Gowans on Nov. 12 writes. " Human Rights Watch, presenting itself as an impartial observer, produces lower estimates (of Afghan civilian deaths) than the enemy government does, and thereby underscores Washington's claim that the enemy is exaggerating for propaganda purposes.

HRW is well-funded, and it's well-connected. Its links snake through the foreign policy establishment of the United States, through the State Department, and through the government's propaganda arm, Radio Free Europe."

Heather Cottin

Amnesty International is another Human Rights -organization. They have not paid attention for instance on the horrible human rights situation in the fascist NATO-Turkey. They focuse only marginal phenomena and "human rights" in socialist countries. Their truth is very selective.

The real human rights include right for education, work, at least moderate standard of living, housing and health care. These concepts are unknown for the bourgeois "human rights organizations".

According to the bourgeois "human rights organizations" one of the most important things is right to vote in elections which do not have any signifigance. Industrialized capitalist countries are usually in fact systems without any ideological alternative. At the same time, democratically elected bodies have lost their power to the executive sector. Lobbyists control their decisionmaking, not voters. The democratic meaning of parliaments or congresses in the big state union -type societies hs totally diasappeared.

---------------------

In 2004, when lies of Bush and Blair on Iraq and Afghanistan were revealed and U.S. prison tortures came to daylight , the human rights organizations have made also good work when paying attention on consequences of the absurd wars. However, this attitude may have been necessary because of impossibility to deny self-evident facts.

In June 2004 Human Rights First -organization reported of the secret U.S. concentration camps in different places in the world. So far not word concerning these human rights violences neither by Amnesty International nor by Human Rights Watch.

KOMINFORM